To be truthful Im not really interested in high-end audio. I
might have expected in that past that I would be, but the diminishing returns gained with
high-end stuff dont really attract me. The other problem is the lack of credibility
- its just way too hard to find the truth up there in the dizzy heights of high-end.
Although, to be fair, credibility is not something that the audio-industry is strong on as
a whole (as shown by the industrys rediscovery of valves, vinyl and high-efficiency
loudspeakers).
So, leaving the music aside (which one should never do), my audio
interests are always aroused when "vintage audio" is mentioned. I dont
really know what vintage audio is to most people - but for me is usually has to be before
1970, but after 1945. Some people might call that the Golden Age. Golden or not, there was
some good stuff done back then.
It seems easy to attach a degree of "romance" to vintage
audio gear - to hear it through rose-coloured ears, if you follow my meaning. An example
of this was at the recent "analogue" revival Club Meeting. Danny had brought
along his Radford STA25 amplifier. Just the mention of this amplifier is likely to turn
many a head. But we could have had any other modern amplifier there that evening -
after-all, analogue doesnt mean valves necessarily, and it doesnt mean old
either. But to a vintage audio enthusiast like me, there is more thrill hearing music
through this classic vintage amp than through a modern amplifier of any type. Thats
where the romance and rose-coloured-ears come into play. Even before the music starts,
Ive decided that this is going to be great, just because its a Radford with a
heritage. Call it down right bias if you like. It doesnt matter, because the result
is that I enjoy the music better. And thats regardless of whether the Radford really
is a good amplifier or not - the heritage-factor alone has improved the sound. That to me
is vintage audio.
At a more nuts-and-bolts level, vintage audio is also about
"original condition". This means a minimalist approach to modifications.
Its a fact of life that vintage gear will need servicing, and so most often it
cannot run properly with 40-year-old factory-fitted components. But modifications in
design are not something I include as a part of vintage audio (although some others would
include it). When it comes to modifications that are destructive or irreversible - like
drilling a hold in a chassis - well "das ist verboten!".
I have the feeling that vintage audio is a growing sub-culture, as I
am not the only one interested in it. There are other MACers that do it too. On a
wider scale though, the biggest proof of existence is perhaps the Internet auction site,
ebay. This web site has a special category for the sale of vintage audio gear. In the not
too distant past, vintage audio might have meant "audio-on-budget".
Unfortunately, this is no longer true. If there is one thing ebay has taught me, it is
that a lot of Americans have a lot of money. Lets put together a nice vintage system
from some components recently sold on ebay:
| Leak Troughline Tuner |
US$280 |
| Marantz Model 7 Pre-Amp |
US$2,699 |
| Marantz Model 2 Power Amps |
US$8,100 |
| Tannoy Monitor Red corner system |
US$4,500 |
| SME 12" pickup arm |
US$405 |
| Ortofon SPU pickup |
US$250 |
| Garrard 301 Turntable |
US$410 |
| Total: |
US$16,644, or about A$33,000! |
The Marantz Model 2 - a pair sold for A$16,000!
(Click on thumbnail for larger image)
Yes, this does represent insanity to me too. These prices actually
mean that some vintage-audio gear is out-stripping the prices for "high-end"
audio
.that part of audio which I declared at the beginning of this yarn not to be
interested in! What an ironic note to end on.
Stephen S